20 Notable Judicial Pronouncements Relating To the Application And Limitation of Public Officers Protection Act, 2004
20 NOTABLE JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS RELATING TO THE APPLICATION AND
LIMITATION OF PUBLIC OFFICERS PROTECTION ACT, 2004.
1. WULANGS V. C.B.N  16 NWLR PT. 1802 PG. 209.
ON THE MEANING OF “PUBLIC OFFICER”.
By Section 18 of the Interpretation Act, the term “public officer” means a member of the public service of the Federation within the meaning of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria or of the public service of a state.
The term “public officer” has by law been extended to include a public department and, therefore, an artificial person, a public office or a public body.
The word “person” under Section 3 of the Interpretation law and Section 18 of the Interpretation Act respectively is defined to include any body of persons corporate or un-incorporate. Therefore, the words “any person” as provided in Section 2 of the Public Officers Protection Act are not limited to only natural persons or human beings or to person sued in their personal names. Unless the contrary intention is indicated, and no such intention is therein manifested, those words in the Public Officers Protection Act include persons known to law, inclusive of artificial persons, public bodies or body of persons corporate or incorporate as well as statutory bodies or persons, whether sued by their official titles or not, so long they are sued in respect of an act or acts done in pursuance or execution of any law or of any public duty or authority.
ADVERTISEMENTBESTSELLER: Commercial and Economic Law in Nigeria By Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN [ORDER NOW] To ORDER click the link https://kluwerlawonline.com/EncyclopediaChapter/IEL+Commercial+and+Economic+Law/COMM20210001
Thus, for the purpose of section 2[a] of the Public Officers Protection Act, the respondent Central Bank of Nigeria, is a public officer.
2. WULANGS V. C.B.N 16 NWLR PT. 1802 PG. 210.
On conditions precedent to application of Section 2[a] of Public Officers Protection Act.
The defence created under the Public Officers Protection Act or Public Officers Protection Law, as the case may be, is for public officers who had acted pursuant to his duties as a public officer.
However, two conditions must exist to avail the officer the protection of section 2 [a] of the Act:
First it must be established that the person against whom the action is commenced is public officer, and
Secondly, the act done by the officer in respect of whom the action was commenced must be an act done in pursuance or execution or intended execution of any law or of any public duty or authority.
The Act gives full protection or cover to all public officers or persons engaged in the execution of public duties who at all materials times acted within the confines of their public duty.
They must not step out of their statutory authority and act outside the statutory or constitutional duty. If they do, they automatically, lose the protection of the law.
3. ABACHA V. A.G. FEDERATION 10 NWLR 1782 PG. 135:
There are at least three circumstances in which the provision of Section 2[a] of the Public Officers Protection Act will apply to foreclose a litigant’s right of action against a public officer. A careful perusal of the section will show that its provision apply to an action being brought against a public other in relation to any act done by the public officer either:
In pursuance or execution or intended execution of any law: or
In pursuance or execution of any public duty or authority: or
In respect of any alleged default or neglect in the execution of any law, duty or authority.
4.ABACHA V. A.G. FEDERATION  10 NWLR PT. 1783 PG. 137.
On when public officer may act outside the scope of an existing law:
Where a public officer in the discharge of his statutory duties, reasonably believes that he is so empowered to act in the interest of the overall wellbeing of the country and goes ahead to act accordingly, even where there is no existing law to back up his action, the Public Officers Protection Act will protect him.
5. CIL. RISK & ASSET MGT. LTD V. EKITI STATE GOVT. 12 NWLR PT.1738 PG. 214.
On object of Public Officers Protection Act.
The Public Officers Protection Act is intended as much as within the limits of the law to protect a public from detractions and unnecessary litigation, but never intended to deprive a party of legal capacity to ventilate his grievance in the face of stark injustice.
6. CIL. RISH & ASSET MGT. LTD V. EKITI STATE GOVT. 12 NWLR PT.1738 PG. 214-215
On whether Public Officers Protection Act applies to public officers in the service of a state.
The Public Officers Protection Act, Cap. P41, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 [updated up to the 31st day of December, 2010] enacted pursuant to item 53 on the exclusive legislative list and Section 4 and  of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, applies only to protect public officers in the “public service of the federation”. It has no general application such as to apply or offer protection to public officers in the service of Ekiti State or any other state in the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The public service of Ekiti State is a matter within the residual list , meaning that it is neither in the exclusive legislative list set out in part 1 of the second schedule to the Constitution nor on the concurrent legislative list set out in the first column of the second schedule to the Constitution.
It follows therefore that the public service of Ekiti State being a residual matter, by virtue of section 4 [b] and  of the Constitution 1999, as amended, only the Ekiti State House of Assembly, to the exclusion of the National Assembly, can constitutionally legislate on it. The respondents could not resort to the federal statute,The Public Officers Protection Act, to seek a statutory defence for officers in Ekiti State public service.
7. INEC V. ENASITO 11 SCM PG. 61-62
Public Officers Protection Act and the yardsticks to determine whether an action is statute barred.
The essence of a limitation law is that the legal right to enforce an action is not a perpetual right but a right generally limited by statute, where a statute of limitation prescribes a period within which an action should be brought, legal proceedings cannot be properly validly instituted after the expiration of the prescribed period.
Therefore, a cause of action is statute barred if legal proceedings cannot be commenced in respect of same because the period laid down by the limitation law had passed. An action which is not brought within the prescribed period, offend the provision of the law and does not give rise to a cause of action.
The yardsticks to determine whether an action is statute barred are:
The date when the cause of action accrued.
The date of commencement of the suit as indicated in the writ of summons.
Period of time presented to bringing an action to be ascertained from the statute in question. Time begins to run for the purpose of the limitation law from the date the cause of action accrues.
8. C.B.N V. OKOJIE 14NWLR PT. 1479 PG. 231 at 261.
Where cause of action is a continuing one, three months starts to run from cessation of injury.
The well laid down interpretation of the limitation law, in this case , section 2 of the Act is that action filed in court after three months from the date the cause of action is a continuing act or a case of continuance of damage or injury, the three months starts to run from the cessation of the continuing act, damage, or injury and if the action is at the instance of a prisoner, he may commence his action within three months after he is allowed home from prison.
9. SYLVA V. INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION 16 NWLR PT. 1486 PG. 576 at 620
Successful defence under the Act ousts the jurisdiction of the court.
A successful defence under this act ousts the jurisdiction of the court. One of the four conditions for the court to exercise jurisdiction in a given case is that the suit must have been commenced by due process of law and upon fulfillment of any condition precedent to assume jurisdiction. A suit commenced after the expiration of the time stipulated in the Act cannot be said to have been commenced by due process.
10. N.I.C V. AMINU 8 NWLR PT. 330 CA.
Nature of actions that do not fall within the provision of the Public Officers Protection Act.
Actions for recovery of land, breach of contract, claim for work and labour done, do not fall within the provisions of Public Officers Protection Act.
To be continued.
Moruff O. Balogun Esq.
Ijebu Ode, Ogun State.
Call Bridget Edokwe Esq on 08060798767 or send your email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Get ‘Personal Property Law in Nigeria’ By Chief Mike A.A. Ozekhome, SAN (FREE)
Click below to download FREEhttps://www.pulp.up.ac.za/monographs/personal-property-law-in-nigeria
Buy the Book on Military Law, authored by a Veteran Military Lawyer, and launched personally by the then COAS.
To view About the book Author, Foreword and Table of Content, click Below [https://godigital.ng/about_book.pdf] To Place order and Cost, click here [https://godigital.ng/place_order.aspx Any further question or clarification call 08163162202 or send mail to email@example.com
Price: ₦15,000 or £20 per copy [Hard Back– 20 chaps/715 pages] Contact Information Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com WhatsApp only: 0803-703-5989 Voice Call – Mobile: 0817-630-8030,+234-805-2128-456, +234-909-
Available at Frank Agbedo & Co. Crown Chambers. 5th floor, left wing, Nipost Building, Lagos Island, Lagos State. Tel: 08033254471, 09077950432 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
The price of the book is fifteen thousand Naira (N 15,000) only.
Call any of the numbers below to place your order 08052508679, 08106743227; or visit, Theemploymentlawhandbook.com. for more information.
Price: ₦15,000 or £20 per copy [Hard Back– 21 chaps/700 pages]: Contact: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org WhatsApp only: 0803-703-5989 : Voice Call – Mobile: 0817-630-8030, 0909-965-1401; 0705-767-0347; 0912-173-4691 : Landline: 09-2913581; 09-2913499
TO ORDER/BUY THE BOOK CLICK BELOW https://flutterwave.com/store/juristpublicationseries - Alternative Mode of Payment: Pay to: Jurist Publication Series, GTBANK 0218803029-- Upon payment, call or text.