On The Effect Of The Retraction Of A Confessional Statement

Spread the love

It is well grounded law that where on the production of a confession it is challenged on the ground that an accused person did not make it at all, the question whether he made it or not is a matter to be decided at the conclusion of the trial by the learned trial Judge himself. Whatever objection may be made by counsel in such circumstances does not affect the admissibility of the statement and therefore it would be admitted in evidence as the issue of voluntariness or otherwise if the statement does not arise for consideration and decision of this Court See:Ā QUEEN VS IGWEĀ (1960) FSC 55; (1960) SCNLR 158;Ā IKPASA VS ATTORNEY-GENERAL, BENDEL STATEĀ (1981) 9 SC 7.
This Court again inĀ SHUAIBU ABDU VS. THE STATEĀ (2006) 12 SC (Pt. VI) at Page 103Ā held that:-



ā€œā€¦ the prosecution heavily relied on the confession of the accused/appellant in proof of its case. I am mindful of the fact that a free and voluntary confession of guilt whether judicial or extra-judicial which is direct, positive and properly proved is enough to establish a conviction, so long as the Court is satisfied with its truth. SeeĀ THOMAS AKPAN EKONG VS. THE STATEĀ (2013) All FWLR (pt. 685) 353;Ā ODEY v. F. R. NĀ (2008) 3 -4 SC 142ā€.
However, inĀ EGBOGHONOME VS. THE STATEĀ (1993) 7 NWLR (pt. 306) 383Ā It was held that:-
ā€œWhere an extra-judicial confession has been proved to have been made voluntarilyĀ and it is positive and unequivocal and amount to an admission of guilt, as in the instant case, it will suffice to ground a finding of guilt regardless of the fact that the maker resiled therefrom or retracted it altogether at the trial, since such u-turn does not necessarily make the confession inadmissible.ā€
See alsoĀ QUEEN VS ITULEĀ (1961) 2 SCNLR 183;Ā AREMU VS. THE STATEĀ (1984) 6 SC 85;Ā EJINIMA VS. THE STATEĀ (1991) 6 NWLR (Pt.200) 62:Ā AKPAN VS. THE STATEĀ (1992) 6 NWLR (Pt.248) 439Ā andĀ AKINFE VS. STATEĀ (1988) 3 NWLR (Pt.85) 729.
InĀ SULE VS. THE STATEĀ (2009) 4 NCC 456,Ā this Court decided that:-
ā€œA Court can still convict on a confessional statement alone even if the accused person resiles from it. A confessional statement is part of the evidence adduced by the prosecutionā€.
See alsoĀ ADEKOYA VS. THE STATEĀ (2012) 1 NCC page 7Ā andĀ ONYEYE VS. THE STATEĀ 7 NCC page 304.

Call Bridget Edokwe Esq on 08060798767 or send your email to ngbarrister@gmail.com

Get ā€˜Personal Property Law in Nigeriaā€™ By Chief Mike A.A. Ozekhome, SAN (FREE)

Click below to download FREE



BESTSELLER: Commercial and Economic Law in Nigeria By Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN [ORDER NOW] To ORDER click the link https://kluwerlawonline.com/EncyclopediaChapter/IEL+Commercial+and+Economic+Law/COMM20210001 Buy the Book on Military Law, authored by a Veteran Military Lawyer, and launched personally by the then COAS.


To get a copy kindly Call 07044444777, 07044444999 & 08181999888 or visit us at: Investment House, 7th Floor, 21/25 Broad St., Lagos. Buy online @ www.alexandernigeria.com

Available at Frank Agbedo & Co. Crown Chambers. 5th floor, left wing, Nipost Building, Lagos Island, Lagos State. Tel: 08033254471, 09077950432 Email: frankagbedo@gmail.com

Steps To Subscribe To the Court of Appeal Reports Nigeria

%d bloggers like this: